On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 20:15:45 -0200
Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi <giuliano.belinassi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Just some random though. Instead of introducing extra level of indentation you
> > can simply check whether is_ad778x is asserted and simply return.
>
> I agree that the patch would be smaller if I do that, but is it really
> an issue? If yes, then I will update the patch with this change
>
> > Any reason for setting this explicitly? That's going to be false anyway
>
> It seems clearer to me :-)
Definitely marginal, but not a strong reason either way so I've
applied this as is. If there were lots of instances of it I would
have agreed with Tomasz (both suggestions were good but Tomasz said,
minor!)
Jonathan
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:26 PM Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Giuliano,
> >
> > Comment inline.
> >
> > On 11/8/18 2:03 PM, Giuliano Belinassi wrote:
> > > Only the ad778x have the 'gain' status bit. Check it before updating
> > > through a new variable is_ad778x in chip_info.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Giuliano Belinassi <giuliano.belinassi@xxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Squashed is_ad778x declaration commit with the ad778x checkage
> > > - Changed is_ad778x type to bool
> > >
> > > drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
> > > index 91e016d534ed..9ec2b002539e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct ad7780_chip_info {
> > > struct iio_chan_spec channel;
> > > unsigned int pattern_mask;
> > > unsigned int pattern;
> > > + bool is_ad778x;
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct ad7780_state {
> > > @@ -113,10 +114,12 @@ static int ad7780_postprocess_sample(struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta,
> > > ((raw_sample & chip_info->pattern_mask) != chip_info->pattern))
> > > return -EIO;
> > >
> > > - if (raw_sample & AD7780_GAIN)
> > > - st->gain = 1;
> > > - else
> > > - st->gain = 128;
> > > + if (chip_info->is_ad778x) {
> > > + if (raw_sample & AD7780_GAIN)
> > > + st->gain = 1;
> > > + else
> > > + st->gain = 128;
> > > + }
> >
> > Just some random though. Instead of introducing extra level of indentation you
> > can simply check whether is_ad778x is asserted and simply return.
> >
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -135,21 +138,25 @@ static const struct ad7780_chip_info ad7780_chip_info_tbl[] = {
> > > .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(12, 24),
> > > .pattern = 0x5,
> > > .pattern_mask = 0x7,
> > > + .is_ad778x = false,
> >
> > Any reason for setting this explicitly? That's going to be false anyway.
> >
> > > },
> > > [ID_AD7171] = {
> > > .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(16, 24),
> > > .pattern = 0x5,
> > > .pattern_mask = 0x7,
> > > + .is_ad778x = false,
> > > },
> > > [ID_AD7780] = {
> > > .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(24, 32),
> > > .pattern = 0x1,
> > > .pattern_mask = 0x3,
> > > + .is_ad778x = true,
> > > },
> > > [ID_AD7781] = {
> > > .channel = AD7780_CHANNEL(20, 32),
> > > .pattern = 0x1,
> > > .pattern_mask = 0x3,
> > > + .is_ad778x = true,
> > > },
> > > };
> > >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kernel USP" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-usp+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> > To post to this group, send email to kernel-usp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kernel-usp/55b5de74-a607-94b9-8c85-40658e38fbb5%40gmail.com.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
