On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 22:03:54 +0530 Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:22:15PM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:44 +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote: > > > Use the gpiod interface instead of the deprecated old non-descriptor > > > interface for ldac_pin. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > Hi Nishad, > > > > I have been working on implementing device tree bindings for this > > driver and removing platform data from it. > > > > I've sent a series of patches for it to Jonathan. I didn't send it > > on the mailing list as I wanted to confirm from Jonathan if we wants > > something more to be done in the series. That series also includes > > the change which you are proposing here. > > I am really sorry that you didn't know about this. > > If you are planning to send any other patches for this driver then > > let me know before you start implementing it so that we can > > co-ordinate before doing any work. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c > > > b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c > > > index 3f22d1088713..94f945ba0097 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c > > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > > > */ > > > > > > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > > > -#include <linux/gpio.h> > > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> > > > #include <linux/workqueue.h> > > > #include <linux/device.h> > > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ > > > > > > struct adt7316_chip_info { > > > struct adt7316_bus bus; > > > - u16 ldac_pin; > > > + struct gpio_desc *ldac_pin; > > > u16 int_mask; /* 0x2f */ > > > u8 config1; > > > u8 config2; > > > @@ -950,8 +950,8 @@ static ssize_t adt7316_store_update_DAC(struct > > > device *dev, > > > if (ret) > > > return -EIO; > > > } else { > > > - gpio_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 0); > > > - gpio_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 1); > > > + gpiod_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 0); > > > + gpiod_set_value(chip->ldac_pin, 1); > > > } > > > > > > return len; > > > @@ -2120,7 +2120,14 @@ int adt7316_probe(struct device *dev, struct > > > adt7316_bus *bus, > > > else > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > - chip->ldac_pin = adt7316_platform_data[1]; > > > + chip->ldac_pin = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "ldac", > > > GPIOD_OUT_HIGH); > > > + if (IS_ERR(chip->ldac_pin)) { > > > + ret = PTR_ERR(chip->ldac_pin); > > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request ldac GPIO: %d\n", > > > + ret); > > > + return ret; > > > + } > > > + > > > if (chip->ldac_pin) { > > > chip->config3 |= ADT7316_DA_EN_VIA_DAC_LDCA; > > > if ((chip->id & ID_FAMILY_MASK) == ID_ADT75XX) > Hello Shreeya, > > Sure no problem. > > Thanks and regards, > Nishad Hi Nishad, Thanks for being so understanding on this. I would normally operate a policy of first to post on the list (assuming they update reasonably quickly) is the on I apply, but as you are fine with it and this will save Shreeya a little time (by avoiding a rebase) I'll wait for Shreeya's public version. I once discovered I was one of 3 people working on new drivers for a single camera sensor years ago. All 3 got posted in the same week despite the part having been around for years before that. Sometimes we get unlucky - the nature of opensource ;) Jonathan