>(There is a linux-usp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list >that bounces when I reply, so I removed it from the >cc list) Sorry. I think this may be because my HTML mode in gmail was enabled. > I wrote that to encourage you to do more than > what checkpatch says. > I just moved code around and reduced duplication. > There are many similar opportunities for code > refactoring in staging. Thank you :-) I will put effort to improve these points. > You could test what I wrote, add a good commit > message with a subject like: > > [PATCH V2] staging: iio: ad7280a: Refactor <functionname> > > with a commit message that describes the changes and > perhaps shows the object size difference using > > $ size <old> <new> I will do that. :-) > Are you doing this for a class assignment? Yes, I am. I am into a group that aims to contribute to opensource projects and we chose the Linux kernel. Our mentor suggested us to contribute to the linux-iio Thank you On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:08 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > (There is a linux-usp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list > that bounces when I reply, so I removed it from the > cc list) > > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 19:48 -0300, Giuliano Belinassi wrote: > > Hello, > > Thank you for your review :-). > > Sorry, but I am a newbie on this, and now I am confused about my next > > step. Should I make a v2 based on your changes, or do you want to submit > > your changes? > > I wrote that to encourage you to do more than > what checkpatch says. > > I just moved code around and reduced duplication. > > There are many similar opportunities for code > refactoring in staging. > > You could test what I wrote, add a good commit > message with a subject like: > > [PATCH V2] staging: iio: ad7280a: Refactor <functionname> > > with a commit message that describes the changes and > perhaps shows the object size difference using > > $ size <old> <new> > > Maybe add a Suggested-by: tag if it pleases you, but > what I did is trivial and I think it's unnecessary. > > Are you doing this for a class assignment? > >
