On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 11:23:49 -0500
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
> annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting
> to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458342 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458345 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/health/max30102.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
> index 15ccadc..3e29562 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
> @@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static int max30102_read_measurement(struct max30102_data *data,
> switch (measurements) {
> case 3:
> MAX30102_COPY_DATA(2);
> - case 2: /* fall-through */
> + /* fall through */
> + case 2:
> MAX30102_COPY_DATA(1);
> - case 1: /* fall-through */
> + /* fall through */
> + case 1:
> MAX30102_COPY_DATA(0);
> break;
> default:
