In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458342 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458345 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/health/max30102.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
index 15ccadc..3e29562 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
@@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static int max30102_read_measurement(struct max30102_data *data,
switch (measurements) {
case 3:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(2);
- case 2: /* fall-through */
+ /* fall through */
+ case 2:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(1);
- case 1: /* fall-through */
+ /* fall through */
+ case 1:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(0);
break;
default:
--
2.7.4
