When trying to instantiate a st_accel_i2c device from an ACPI based system, I ran into some problems: For my device, there is no ACPI match table entry, so rather than creating /allocating a new ACPI HID for the device, I wanted to use an existing DT table compatible entry via creating an ACPI_DT_NAMESPACE_HID /PRP0001 HID ACPI entry (see Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt). This did not work because st_accel_i2c.c bails out if there is a ACPI node but no ACPI table match instead of looking for a match from one of the fallback mechanisms (patch 1). Patch 2 removes an error message when a ACPI node exists but no table entry is found (this doesn't need to be fatal because of the fallback). Patch 3 syncs the strings in the I2C device table (which is used by the I2C core for fallback matching) with the DT compatible strings, so a PRP0001 entry can use the same compatible strings as a corresponding DT entry. As far as I can see, the old I2C table strings aren't used in mainline, so renaming them should be safe. Nikolaus Voss (3): IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use fallback if DT/ACPI enum failed IIO: st_sensors_i2c.c: Don't print error on failed ACPI match IIO: st_accel.h: sync DT and I2C device ID table strings drivers/iio/accel/st_accel.h | 32 +++++++++---------- drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_i2c.c | 21 ++++++------ .../iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_i2c.c | 5 ++- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html