Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: advertise max and min freqs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 16 May 2018 09:07:53 -0700
Martin Kelly <mkelly@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 05/16/2018 12:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 15/05/2018 23:53, Martin Kelly wrote:  
> >> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. 
> >> Please make sure the sender is who they say they are and do not click 
> >> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
> >> content is safe.
> >>
> >>
> >> Currently, we allow a minimum FIFO rate of 4 and a max of 1000, but we
> >> advertise down to only 10 and up to 1000. Expand the advertised range to
> >> reflect the full available range.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <mkelly@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c 
> >> b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> >> index 43fba5f7532b..3f4862f09db3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> >> @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec 
> >> inv_mpu_channels[] = {
> >>   };
> >>
> >>   /* constant IIO attribute */
> >> -static IIO_CONST_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ_AVAIL("10 20 50 100 200 500");
> >> +static IIO_CONST_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ_AVAIL("4 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000");
> >>   static IIO_CONST_ATTR(in_anglvel_scale_available,
> >>                                            "0.000133090 0.000266181 
> >> 0.000532362 0.001064724");
> >>   static IIO_CONST_ATTR(in_accel_scale_available,
> >> -- 
> >> 2.11.0
> >>  
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > in fact we advertise only frequencies that are supported by the low-pass 
> > filter. Filter bandwidths are: 5Hz, 10Hz, 20Hz, 42Hz (~50), 98Hz (~100), 
> > 188Hz (~200), which are corresponding to a sampling rate of (x2): 10Hz, 
> > 20Hz, ~50Hz, ~200Hz, ~400Hz. Only 500Hz is a little out of specs, since 
> > 400Hz is not a possible frequency.
> > 
> > You can always set the frequency to any supported values, but you can 
> > suffer from aliasing.
> > 
> > I strongly suggest we just keep it like it is today. Better not 
> > advertise frequencies that are not correctly filtered.
> > 
> > JB  
> 
> OK, that makes sense and is fine with me. Perhaps I should instead just 
> add a comment explaining the situation, since I couldn't tell from the 
> code itself.
Hmm. If this wasn't already the case I would advocate never allowing the
user to pick frequencies where the device effectively won't work properly.

Ah well, too late now as they are in the ABI.  Agreed a comment would
avoid anyone trying to figure this out in future.

Jonathan

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux