On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 21:41:57 +0100
Javier Arteaga <javier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 04:54:41PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I don't really see the connection between the change in here
> > and what the description says...
>
> I think you're right, we didn't make our intent clear here.
>
> > If you are probing from ACPI then there is no need to ensure
> > a valid of table is supplied (even if we aren't building with OF)
> > which is what I think this patch is trying to do...
>
> The patch enables ACPI _DSD to reuse existing DT "compatible" strings,
> as described in Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt, even without OF.
> This kind of patch has some precedent, like for example:
>
> 01427fe7c4b9 ("Input: adxl34x - make it enumerable in ACPI environment")
>
> To clarify, for the UP2 board we don't actually need this patch as we
> have an ACPI _HID - just thought it would might be an improvement for
> others.
>
> I'll improve the description and perhaps reorder this patch last for v2.
> Or I can send separately if you prefer.
>
> Thanks for your review!
Unless we know of ACPI firmwares out there that are doing this, drop the
patch for now. I don't want to see a flood of these based on a 'you can
do it that' way argument.
Jonathan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
