On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:46:40 -0300
Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The original code of AD2S1210 does not have documentation for structs
> and register configurations; this difficult the code comprehension. This
> patch adds structs documentation, briefly comments some register
> settings and acronyms, and adds little explanations of some calculation
> found in the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@xxxxxxxxx>
Various comments inline.
Only a few of them are about you actual patch - mostly more general.
I'd look at renaming all those defines to be more consistent. There
is no association between bits of a register and the register at the
moment which will make the code rather error prone.
Note this is going to be a difficult driver to get out of staging.
There is quite a bit to do and we don't currently have anyone who
has test hardware as far as I know. So brave move ;)
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.h | 9 ++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.c b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.c
> index ac13b99bd9cb..9bb8fd782f5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@
>
> #define DRV_NAME "ad2s1210"
>
> +/* The default value of the control register on power-up */
> #define AD2S1210_DEF_CONTROL 0x7E
>
> +/* Control Register Bit */
I would change the defines to make this explicit.
This is a truely odd bit of naming anyway.
#define AD2S1210_ADDRESS 0x80
#define AD2S1210_DATA 0x00
and perhaps a
#define AD2S1210_DATA_MASK 0x7F
would make sense?
> #define AD2S1210_MSB_IS_HIGH 0x80
> #define AD2S1210_MSB_IS_LOW 0x7F
> #define AD2S1210_PHASE_LOCK_RANGE_44 0x20
> @@ -39,14 +41,23 @@
>
> #define AD2S1210_REG_POSITION 0x80
> #define AD2S1210_REG_VELOCITY 0x82
> +
> +/* Loss of Signal (LOS) register address */
> #define AD2S1210_REG_LOS_THRD 0x88
> +
> +/* Degradation of Signal (DOS) register address */
addresses
> #define AD2S1210_REG_DOS_OVR_THRD 0x89
> #define AD2S1210_REG_DOS_MIS_THRD 0x8A
> #define AD2S1210_REG_DOS_RST_MAX_THRD 0x8B
> #define AD2S1210_REG_DOS_RST_MIN_THRD 0x8C
> +
> +/* Loss of Tracking (LOT) register address */
addresses
> #define AD2S1210_REG_LOT_HIGH_THRD 0x8D
> #define AD2S1210_REG_LOT_LOW_THRD 0x8E
> +
> +/* Excitation Frequency (EXCIT) register address */
> #define AD2S1210_REG_EXCIT_FREQ 0x91
> +
> #define AD2S1210_REG_CONTROL 0x92
> #define AD2S1210_REG_SOFT_RESET 0xF0
> #define AD2S1210_REG_FAULT 0xFF
> @@ -69,6 +80,20 @@ enum ad2s1210_mode {
>
> static const unsigned int ad2s1210_resolution_value[] = { 10, 12, 14, 16 };
>
> +/**
> + * struct ad2s1210_state - device instance specific state.
> + * @pdata: chip model specific constants, gpioin, etc
Except they aren't anything to do with the chip model. This is about
how it is wired not what it is.
> + * @lock: lock to ensure state is consistent
> + * @sdev: the SPI device for this driver instance
> + * @fclkin: frequency of clock input
> + * @fexcit: excitation frequency
> + * @hysteresis: cache of whether hysteresis is enabled
> + * @old_data: cache of SPI communication after operation
Umm. You got rid of this one in the earlier patch didn't you?
> + * @resolution: chip resolution could be 10/12/14/16-bit
>From reading the datasheet quickly I suspect there is a 'best possible'
resolution given a particular set of controls. I'm not sure we want
to expose this to userspace at all.
> + * @mode: indicates the operating mode
Where operating mode is what? Comment would be more useful if it
listed them.
> + * @rx: receive buffer
> + * @tx: transmit buffer
> + */
> struct ad2s1210_state {
> const struct ad2s1210_platform_data *pdata;
> struct mutex lock;
> @@ -82,6 +107,7 @@ struct ad2s1210_state {
> u8 tx[2] ____cacheline_aligned;
> };
>
> +/* Maps A0 and A1 inputs to the respective mode. */
> static const int ad2s1210_mode_vals[4][2] = {
> [MOD_POS] = { 0, 0 },
> [MOD_VEL] = { 0, 1 },
> @@ -137,6 +163,11 @@ int ad2s1210_update_frequency_control_word(struct ad2s1210_state *st)
> int ret;
> unsigned char fcw;
>
> + /*
> + * The fcw stands for frequency control word, which can be obtained
> + * from:
> + * fcw = (Excitation Frequency * 2^15) / fclkin
> + */
Whilst we are here - userspace being responsible for writing a hardware
frequency input needs to change. Makes no sense.
> fcw = (unsigned char)(st->fexcit * (1 << 15) / st->fclkin);
> if (fcw < AD2S1210_MIN_FCW || fcw > AD2S1210_MAX_FCW) {
> dev_err(&st->sdev->dev, "ad2s1210: FCW out of range\n");
> @@ -158,6 +189,7 @@ static unsigned char ad2s1210_read_resolution_pin(struct ad2s1210_state *st)
> return ad2s1210_resolution_value[resolution];
> }
>
> +/* Maps RES0 and RES1 inputs to the respective mode. */
> static const int ad2s1210_res_pins[4][2] = {
> { 0, 0 }, {0, 1}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.h b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.h
> index e9b2147701fc..cbe21bca7638 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/resolver/ad2s1210.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /*
> - * ad2s1210.h plaform data for the ADI Resolver to Digital Converters:
> + * ad2s1210.h platform data for the ADI Resolver to Digital Converters:
> * AD2S1210
Hmm. I would suggest that, seeing as we don't have any in kernel users
we should probably just drop the platform data in favour of a devicetree
binding.
Fair enough to document it as an intermediate step however.
> *
> * Copyright (c) 2010-2010 Analog Devices Inc.
> @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
> #ifndef _AD2S1210_H
> #define _AD2S1210_H
>
> +/**
> + * struct ad2s1210_platform_data - chip model
> + * @sample: sample input used to clearing the fault register
This hasn't been a good means of proving a gpio for some time.
These all want converting over to the current gpio handling best practice.
> + * @a: array of inputs (A0 and A1)
> + * @res: array of resolution inputs (RES0 and RES1)
> + * @gpioin: control the read operation
In what way? I think this is actually a hack to allow for the
fact that the above pins may not be controllable by the driver.
Not sure though as I haven't chased through the code fully.
> + */
> struct ad2s1210_platform_data {
> unsigned int sample;
> unsigned int a[2];
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
