On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 15:19 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:40:26 +0100
> Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > >
> > > From an IIO sensor point of view A Gesture sensor:
> > > Outputs
> > > A pre defined activity type
> > > WAKE
> > > TILT
> > > GLANCE
> > > PICK_UP
> > > &
> > > more
> > >
> > > A user defined activity type as "string"
> > Pre-defined activities are easy.
> >
> > But what about user-defined activities? We'd really like common
> > interface across different hardware...
> Nasty to handle indeed. It may be the best we can do initially
> at least is user_definedN or similar. No way of constraining
> users from uploading something really odd that we can't define
> an interface for (hopping whilst holding a phone in
> their teeth?)
That's what I think also. We pre define few USER defined activities
Ids.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Inputs
> > > A raw binary cdev interface to download templates/patterns
> > ....and "raw binary" will not work across different hardware :-(.
> Sadly there probably isn't much we can do about the format being
> custom.
> Best bet would ultimately be if there was at least a standard tool
> to generate the files for different devices...
>
Correct. This will depend on the firmware expected format . I think
ultimately it will be standardized.
Thanks,
Srinivas
> >
> >
> >
> > Pavel��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��(��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
