On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm rather unsure if we should be adding more gyro only > support for these devices. Ths lsm9ds0 was in theory > a stop gap whilst support was properly sorted out. > > Looking back Crestez did post an RFC for each of the > parts as well for reference but made the point that this was > the wrong way to do things. > > This part (and the ds0) really need to be supported by a proper gyro/accel > driver rather than just cherry picking out the gyro part. So what we need is a combined driver that expose the gyro and accell channels in the same device, right? What a mess. That means we can only use half the device at the time at best. Do we have a list of all of those ST devices that this situation pertains to? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
