On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 01:26:47 +0200
> Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This series prepares the necessary infrastructure for ADC platform device on
>> Cirrus Logic EP93xx family of SoCs and adds the driver for ADC device using
>> IIO subsystem.
> The reason these have been reposted is because the EP93xx don't
> have an actual tree as such. They are typically handled
> directly through the arm-soc tree.
>
> As such I'm looking for a route to get this applied.
> The dependencies are such that the whole series should go through
> either arm-soc or iio. I don't really mind which.
> Either I need Acks for applying the patches that touch
> the arch bits (we have Ryan's but I'd like a more general
> arm-soc one given this will be in your area), or
> I will probably ack the driver in a minute so the log can
> go through arm-soc.
>
> Anyhow, don't really mind but let's get this moving!
Alexander just pointed me to the series, I had missed it earlier.
The patches for arch/arm/mach-ep93xx look reasonable to me,
with one minor complaint: please use "ARM:" as the subject prefix.
Alexander, can you send a pull request for the first four patches
to arm@xxxxxxxxxx, or a set of patches if that is easier for you?
I think the adc driver can just get merged through the iio tree,
as there is no strict build-time dependency. I realize the driver
will fail to link when built on ep93xx or another platform that lacks
the clk_get_parent() implementation, but I think that's ok since
we have an old bug in several platforms concerning this, and
I have proposed a fix for it already.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
