On 21/05/17 15:06, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 21/05/17 13:44, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2017-05-21 14:18, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 21/05/17 13:17, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 21/05/17 12:59, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2017-05-21 12:47, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 17/05/17 16:28, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This is an upstream port of an IIO driver for the TI ADC108S102 and
ADC128S102. The former can be found on the Intel Galileo Gen2 and the
Siemens SIMATIC IOT2000. For those boards, ACPI-based enumeration is
included.
Due to the lack of regulators under ACPI, we hard-code the voltage
provided to the VA pin of the ADC to 5 V, the value used on Galileo
and
IOT2000. For DT usage, the regulator "vref-supply" provides this
information. Note that DT usage has not been tested.
Original author: Bogdan Pricop <bogdan.pricop@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ported from Intel Galileo Gen2 BSP to Intel Yocto kernel:
Todor Minchev <todor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Still an issue wrt to it being obviously correct in the ordering in
probe
and remove.
As a reviewer I want to be able to run through each step in probe and
compare with remove to ensure they occur in the opposite order and
reverse all the steps in probe. Where ever it deviates from that I
have
to think about it and we all know the last thing a reviewer with a big
backlog of patches wants to do is to think hard ;)
Anyhow, I've fixed up and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and
pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.
Please check I haven't made a mess of it.
Forgot to push? Not finding it in togreg, which is 5 days old.
As it says, pushed out as testing... Togreg is non rebasing so only
gets pushed out publicly once all the trivial stuff the autobuilders
find has been sorted.
Depending on how busy I am it can be a few days before I get a chance
to push out togreg, whereas testing goes every few patches when I'm
merging stuff.
Mind you I hadn't pushed that for half an hour or so hence that might
have been out of date too ;)
OK, now I see what went wrong: Please have a second look at commit
52d4de2441af... ;)
Jan
Gah! Thanks. I knew I did that initially but thought I'd unwound the mess.
Seems not - here goes again for trying not to be an idiot.
Thanks for pointing this mess out.
Should now all be fixed up. I pulled the messed up patch to the tip and
split it up into the original two patches. 'looks' right now I think but
if you wouldn't mind having a quick look that would be great.
Jonathan
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
