Thanks Jonathan & Matt, patch have been updated. BR Song Hongyan -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Cameron [mailto:jic23@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 2:30 AM To: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Song, Hongyan <hongyan.song@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND... <linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jikos@xxxxxxxxxx; Pandruvada, Srinivas <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: hid-sensor-rotation: Add relative orientation sensor hid support On 05/05/17 07:18, Matt Ranostay wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Song Hongyan <hongyan.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Relative orientation(AG) sensor is a 6dof orientation sensor, it >> depends on acceleration and gyroscope sensor data. It gives a >> quaternion describing the orientation of the device relative to an >> initial orientation. It is a standard HID sensor. >> >> More information can be found in: >> http://www.usb.org/developers/hidpage/HUTRR59_-_Usages_for_Wearables. >> pdf >> >> Relative orientation(AG) sensor and dev rotation sensor have same >> channels and share channel usage id. So the most of the code for >> relative orientation sensor can be reused. >> >> Signed-off-by: Song Hongyan <hongyan.song@xxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Xu Even <even.xu@xxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- >> include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c >> b/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c >> index a97e802c..5f07a5a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c >> +++ b/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c >> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int dev_rot_parse_report(struct >> platform_device *pdev, static int hid_dev_rot_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) { >> int ret; >> - static char *name = "dev_rotation"; >> + static char *name; >> struct iio_dev *indio_dev; >> struct dev_rot_state *rot_state; >> struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev = >> pdev->dev.platform_data; @@ -234,8 +234,12 @@ static int hid_dev_rot_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> rot_state->common_attributes.hsdev = hsdev; >> rot_state->common_attributes.pdev = pdev; >> >> - ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, >> - HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DEVICE_ORIENTATION, >> + if (hsdev->usage == HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DEVICE_ORIENTATION) >> + name = "dev_rotation"; >> + else if (hsdev->usage == HID_USAGE_SENSOR_RELATIVE_ORIENTATION) >> + name = "relative_orientation"; > > Since you have yet another "else if" in another patch in this series.. > it would be better to have > > switch (hsdev->usage) { > case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DEVICE_ORIENTATION: > name = "dev_rotation" > break; > case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_RELATIVE_ORIENTATION: > name = "relative_orientation"; > break; > default: > **probably some error out if somehow we get here** } > > Seconded. Otherwise the series looks good to me! Jonathan > > >> + >> + ret = hid_sensor_parse_common_attributes(hsdev, hsdev->usage, >> &rot_state->common_attributes); >> if (ret) { >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup common >> attributes\n"); @@ -252,8 +256,7 @@ static int >> hid_dev_rot_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> ret = dev_rot_parse_report(pdev, hsdev, >> (struct iio_chan_spec *)indio_dev->channels, >> - HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DEVICE_ORIENTATION, >> - rot_state); >> + hsdev->usage, rot_state); >> if (ret) { >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup attributes\n"); >> return ret; >> @@ -288,8 +291,7 @@ static int hid_dev_rot_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> rot_state->callbacks.send_event = dev_rot_proc_event; >> rot_state->callbacks.capture_sample = dev_rot_capture_sample; >> rot_state->callbacks.pdev = pdev; >> - ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, >> - HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DEVICE_ORIENTATION, >> + ret = sensor_hub_register_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage, >> &rot_state->callbacks); >> if (ret) { >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "callback reg failed\n"); @@ >> -314,7 +316,7 @@ static int hid_dev_rot_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> struct dev_rot_state *rot_state = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> >> - sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DEVICE_ORIENTATION); >> + sensor_hub_remove_callback(hsdev, hsdev->usage); >> iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); >> hid_sensor_remove_trigger(&rot_state->common_attributes); >> iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev); >> @@ -327,6 +329,10 @@ static int hid_dev_rot_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> /* Format: HID-SENSOR-usage_id_in_hex_lowercase */ >> .name = "HID-SENSOR-20008a", >> }, >> + { >> + /* Relatve orientation(AG) sensor */ > > Slight typo. Should be "Relative" >> + .name = "HID-SENSOR-20008e", >> + }, >> { /* sentinel */ } >> }; >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, hid_dev_rot_ids); diff --git >> a/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h b/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h >> index 30c7dc4..b61b985 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h >> +++ b/include/linux/hid-sensor-ids.h >> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ >> #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ORIENT_TILT_Z 0x200481 >> >> #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_DEVICE_ORIENTATION 0x20008A >> +#define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_RELATIVE_ORIENTATION 0x20008E >> #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ORIENT_ROTATION_MATRIX 0x200482 >> #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ORIENT_QUATERNION 0x200483 >> #define HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ORIENT_MAGN_FLUX 0x200484 >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" >> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo >> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��(��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
