On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron
<jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1 May 2017 20:42:08 BST, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>wrote:
>>> On 29/04/17 08:48, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
>>
>>>> +static int adxl345_set_mode(struct adxl345_data *data, u8 mode)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, ADXL345_REG_POWER_CTL, mode);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set power mode, %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>> drop the return ret here and just return ret at the end of the
>>function.
>>> One of the static checkers will probably moan about this otherwise.
>>
>>But this will be not equivalent!
> Why? Regmap_write returns 0 for success.
If there is a qurantee that regmap_write() doesn't return any positive
values, I'm okay with replacement.
>>
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
