Hi,
On 07-01-17 23:23, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 04/01/17 17:55, Jacob Pan wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:10:57 +0100
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It could have been a quirk we had to do on our platforms, I just
cannot recall the details. Are you testing this on x86 platforms?
Yes, I've successfully tested this on 2 different models cherrytrail
tablets.
[Jacob Pan] I am ok with your change. I last tested on baytrail
tablets, I don't know if you have one available to verify. That would
be ideal.
Stable material? As I read this it is a fairly major fix, but we aren't
entirely sure there wasn't a reason on some platforms for this 'interesting'
corner of code?
So basically are we sure this won't cause regressions? If so I'll take
it as a fix and mark for stable.
The main consumer of the axp288_adc code is the axp288_fuel_gauge driver,
which until now was not really functional. It depended on platform data
being attached to its mfd device, and the provider of that platform data
never got merged.
I've got patches queued up for 4.11 fixing this. So in practice the chance
of this patch causing regressions is close to 0 as so far it had no
consumers, likewise adding a Cc: stable is not really useful.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
