On 04/01/17 17:55, Jacob Pan wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:10:57 +0100 > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> It could have been a quirk we had to do on our platforms, I just >>> cannot recall the details. Are you testing this on x86 platforms? >> >> Yes, I've successfully tested this on 2 different models cherrytrail >> tablets. > > [Jacob Pan] I am ok with your change. I last tested on baytrail > tablets, I don't know if you have one available to verify. That would > be ideal. > Stable material? As I read this it is a fairly major fix, but we aren't entirely sure there wasn't a reason on some platforms for this 'interesting' corner of code? So basically are we sure this won't cause regressions? If so I'll take it as a fix and mark for stable. Thanks, Jonathan > Thanks, > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
