Re: [PATCH] IIO: Change msleep to usleep_range for small msecs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26/11/16 03:47, Aniroop Mathur wrote:

[bmp280.c]

>>       /* Wait to make sure we started up properly */
>> -     mdelay(data->start_up_time);
>> +     usleep_range(data->start_up_time, data->start_up_time + 100);
>
> As this in probe I doubt we really care.  Could just set it longer to shut up the warnings.
> Still would like some input from say Linus on this...

Hm, I don't think it's a big issue... this works too it just looks overworked.

On the runtime_resume() path we use msleep() instead which I guess is why
it is not changed in this patch, but they have the same purpose.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux