On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Peter Meerwald-Stadler
<pmeerw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Add support the VZ89TE variant which removes the voc_short channel,
>> and has CRC check for data transactions.
>
> comments below
>
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
>> index f498228e044d..0347761ebdba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
>> @@ -19,20 +19,33 @@
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>> #include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>>
>> #define VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT 0x09
>> +#define VZ89TE_REG_MEASUREMENT 0x0c
>> +
>> +#define VZ89X_REG_WRITE_SIZE 3
>> +#define VZ89TE_REG_WRITE_SIZE 6
>> +
>> #define VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE 6
>> +#define VZ89TE_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE 7
>>
>> #define VZ89X_VOC_CO2_IDX 0
>> #define VZ89X_VOC_SHORT_IDX 1
>> #define VZ89X_VOC_TVOC_IDX 2
>> #define VZ89X_VOC_RESISTANCE_IDX 3
>>
>> +#define VZ89TE_VOC_TVOC_IDX 0
>> +#define VZ89TE_VOC_CO2_IDX 1
>> +#define VZ89TE_VOC_RESISTANCE_IDX 2
>> +
>> enum {
>> VZ89X,
>> + VZ89TE,
>> };
>>
>> struct vz89x_data {
>> @@ -79,6 +92,40 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec vz89x_channels[] = {
>> .info_mask_separate =
>> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
>> .address = VZ89X_VOC_RESISTANCE_IDX,
>> + .scan_index = -1,
>> + .scan_type = {
>
> scan_type with a scan_index of -1 is unexpected
>
>> + .endianness = IIO_LE,
>> + },
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct iio_chan_spec vz89te_channels[] = {
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_CONCENTRATION,
>> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_VOC,
>> + .modified = 1,
>> + .info_mask_separate =
>> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
>> + .address = VZ89TE_VOC_TVOC_IDX,
>> + },
>> +
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_CONCENTRATION,
>> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_CO2,
>> + .modified = 1,
>> + .info_mask_separate =
>> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
>> + .address = VZ89TE_VOC_CO2_IDX,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_RESISTANCE,
>> + .info_mask_separate =
>> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
>> + .address = VZ89TE_VOC_RESISTANCE_IDX,
>> + .scan_index = -1,
>> + .scan_type = {
>> + .endianness = IIO_BE,
>> + },
>> },
>> };
>>
>> @@ -110,12 +157,27 @@ static int vz89x_measurement_is_valid(struct vz89x_data *data)
>> return !!(data->buffer[data->read_size - 1] > 0);
>> }
>>
>> +/* VZ89TE device has a modified CRC-8 two complement check */
>> +static int vz89te_measurement_is_valid(struct vz89x_data *data)
>
> return bool maybe?
>
>> +{
>> + u8 crc = 0;
>> + int i, sum = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < (data->read_size - 1); i++) {
>> + sum = crc + data->buffer[i];
>> + crc = sum;
>> + crc += sum / 256;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return !((0xff - crc) == data->buffer[data->read_size - 1]);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int vz89x_i2c_xfer(struct vz89x_data *data, u8 cmd)
>> {
>> struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
>> struct i2c_msg msg[2];
>> int ret;
>> - u8 buf[3] = { cmd, 0, 0};
>> + u8 buf[6] = { cmd, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0xf3};
>>
>> msg[0].addr = client->addr;
>> msg[0].flags = client->flags;
>> @@ -173,11 +235,24 @@ static int vz89x_get_measurement(struct vz89x_data *data)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int vz89x_get_resistance_reading(struct vz89x_data *data)
>> +static int vz89x_get_resistance_reading(struct vz89x_data *data,
>> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
>> + int *val)
>> {
>> - u8 *buf = &data->buffer[VZ89X_VOC_RESISTANCE_IDX];
>> + u32 tmp = *((u32 *) ((u8 *) &data->buffer[chan->address]));
>> +
>> + switch (chan->scan_type.endianness) {
>> + case IIO_LE:
>> + *val = le32_to_cpu(tmp) & GENMASK(23, 0);
>
> could use le32_to_cpup() probably
>
>> + break;
>> + case IIO_BE:
>> + *val = be32_to_cpu(tmp) >> 8;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>>
>> - return buf[0] | (buf[1] << 8);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int vz89x_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> @@ -196,15 +271,15 @@ static int vz89x_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - switch (chan->address) {
>> - case VZ89X_VOC_CO2_IDX:
>> - case VZ89X_VOC_SHORT_IDX:
>> - case VZ89X_VOC_TVOC_IDX:
>> + switch (chan->type) {
>> + case IIO_CONCENTRATION:
>> *val = data->buffer[chan->address];
>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> - case VZ89X_VOC_RESISTANCE_IDX:
>> - *val = vz89x_get_resistance_reading(data);
>> - return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> + case IIO_RESISTANCE:
>> + ret = vz89x_get_resistance_reading(data, chan, val);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -219,12 +294,12 @@ static int vz89x_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> }
>> break;
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
>> - switch (chan->address) {
>> - case VZ89X_VOC_CO2_IDX:
>> + switch (chan->channel2) {
>> + case IIO_MOD_CO2:
>> *val = 44;
>> *val2 = 250000;
>> return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
>> - case VZ89X_VOC_TVOC_IDX:
>> + case IIO_MOD_VOC:
>> *val = -13;
>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> default:
>> @@ -241,11 +316,20 @@ static const struct iio_info vz89x_info = {
>> .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id vz89x_dt_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "sgx,vz89x", .data = (void *) VZ89X },
>> + { .compatible = "sgx,vz89te", .data = (void *) VZ89TE },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vz89x_dt_ids);
>> +
>> static int vz89x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>> struct vz89x_data *data;
>> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>> + int chip_id;
>>
>> indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));
>> if (!indio_dev)
>> @@ -260,13 +344,15 @@ static int vz89x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> else
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> + of_id = of_match_device(vz89x_dt_ids, &client->dev);
>> + if (!of_id)
>> + chip_id = id->driver_data;
>> + else
>> + chip_id = (unsigned long)of_id->data;
>> +
>> i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
>> data->client = client;
>> data->last_update = jiffies - HZ;
>> - data->cmd = VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT;
>> - data->write_size = 3;
>> - data->read_size = VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE;
>> - data->valid = &vz89x_measurement_is_valid;
>> mutex_init(&data->lock);
>>
>> indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev;
>> @@ -274,24 +360,35 @@ static int vz89x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> indio_dev->name = dev_name(&client->dev);
>> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>>
>> - indio_dev->channels = vz89x_channels;
>> - indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vz89x_channels);
>> + switch (chip_id) {
>> + case VZ89X:
>> + indio_dev->channels = vz89x_channels;
>> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vz89x_channels);
>
> other drivers often use a constant chip_info struct which is used to
> declare chip variants (less code, more data)
Yeah probably should have done this.. will fix in v2
>
>> + data->cmd = VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT;
>> + data->write_size = VZ89X_REG_WRITE_SIZE;
>> + data->read_size = VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE;
>> + data->valid = &vz89x_measurement_is_valid;
>> + break;
>> + case VZ89TE:
>> + indio_dev->channels = vz89te_channels;
>> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vz89te_channels);
>> + data->cmd = VZ89TE_REG_MEASUREMENT;
>> + data->write_size = VZ89TE_REG_WRITE_SIZE;
>> + data->read_size = VZ89TE_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE;
>> + data->valid = &vz89te_measurement_is_valid;
>> + break;
>> + }
>>
>> return devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);
>> }
>>
>> static const struct i2c_device_id vz89x_id[] = {
>> { "vz89x", VZ89X },
>> + { "vz89te", VZ89TE },
>> { }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, vz89x_id);
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id vz89x_dt_ids[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "sgx,vz89x", .data = (void *) VZ89X },
>> - { }
>> -};
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vz89x_dt_ids);
>> -
>> static struct i2c_driver vz89x_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "vz89x",
>>
>
> --
>
> Peter Meerwald-Stadler
> +43-664-2444418 (mobile)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
