Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: st_sensors: read each channel individually

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/16 07:50, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 29/03/16 09:15, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> So there are sensors out there that doesn't work well
>>> with the bulk read optimization.
>>>
>>> I think this patch should be applied for fixes, tell me if
>>> you need it rebased as the first patch (though I think it
>>> will just apply).
>>>
>>> Giuseppe/Denis? Agree?
>>
>> Anyone want to comment on this?
> 
> I'd say apply it.
> 
> If bulk mode should be supported it needs to be opt-in
> since the LIS331DL obviously cannot handle it.
> 
Unfortunately the context has changed a lot due to your earlier patch:

iio: st_sensors: simplify buffer address handling
which is in the togreg branch this is based on, but hasn't yet hit
mainline.  Looking at dates it must have 'just missed' the last merge
window.

Given how different they are I think we are going to have to do different
patches for current tree and a backported one.

So I'll pick this up in the togreg branch so we can move forward with
that but can you roll one against current mainline as well.

Thanks,

Jonathan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux