On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24/03/16 13:18, Linus Walleij wrote: >> This makes all ST sensor drivers check that they actually have >> new data available for the requested channel(s) before claiming >> an IRQ, by reading the status register (which is conveniently >> the same for all ST sensors) and check that the channel has new >> data before proceeding to read it and fill the buffer. >> >> This way sensors can share an interrupt line: it can be flaged >> as shared and then the sensor that did not fire will return >> NO_IRQ, and the sensor that fired will handle the IRQ and >> return IRQ_HANDLED. >> > Looks good and even matches on the archaic lis3l02dq I keep meaning > to add to the driver :) (had that datasheet lying around) > > One day we'll figure out how to report 'overruns' sensibly at > which point we can use the other bits in that register as well. > > Anyhow, will let this sit just a little longer as would like Denis > and/or Giuseppe to have a look at it as well. If no further comments I guess this could be applied? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
