On 03/28/2016 05:03 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
[snip...]
Why is the sysfs interface specific to ak8975?
AFAIK, this is just the first IIO driver implementation relying on floating
point numbers. Should a single driver be enough to justify a "generic" API,
I suppose code could be factored out in a similar way to over sampling rate
support. People could call this on a per-driver basis.
Given it is an ABI, yes I think so. We don't want to end up with a
bunch of similar yet different interfaces.
Absolutely. Most interfaces get made up based on one implementation ;)
A second is always nice, but here the interface is obvious enough we don't
need to wait.
Right. I'll post a separate patch then.
Furthermore, why is it specific to magnetometer? Couldn't
accelerometers need the same thing? There's a thread discussing a
similar matrix on android-x86[1].
Same may apply to gyro / accelero / imu and magnetometers at least.
inv_mpu_core.c already implements such a rotation matrix exposed as 3x3 integers
array. Should we be smart enough to keep this compatible with existing userspace
apps ?
You have to maintain the ABI. If both interfaces can co-exist, then
you can have both and mark the old one as deprecated. In time we can
remove the old one.
If you want to (or someone else does) it would be good to add the new abi to
inv_mpu_core as well and indeed mark the old one as deprecated.
The cost of keeping it is negligible, so we may never actually bother to
remove it.
What's the better way to mark this as deprecated ? dev_warn() ?
__deprecated ?
Anything else ?
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt
index 34a3206..f936f86 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/ak8975.txt
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Optional properties:
- gpios : should be device tree identifier of the magnetometer DRDY pin
- vdd-supply: an optional regulator that needs to be on to provide VDD
+ - matrix: an optional 3x3 mounting rotation matrix
Perhaps "rotation-matrx" would be a better name in case there's ever
any other matrix needed.
What about "mounting-matrix" ?
Sure.
Works for me as well.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
