Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] Fixes: 3145229f9191 ("iio:pressure:ms5611: power regulator support")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 03/09/2016 11:06 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
Am 2016-03-09 um 11:02 schrieb Gregor Boirie:
Hi Daniel,

On 03/08/2016 10:16 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Gregor Boirie
<gregor.boirie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When not compiled-in, regulator layer will return a NULL pointer when
trying to get a reference to any regulator using
devm_regulator_get().  As
IS_ERR() does not consider this an error, the ms5611 probing
operation will
try to enable a NULL regulator, which will invariably cause a kernel
crash.
This patch fixes this situation by using devm_regulator_get_optional()
instead of devm_regulator_get().

Signed-off-by: Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@xxxxxxxxxx>
$Subject should be here. And the commit subject should be something
more appropriate like:

iio: pressure: ms5611: Fix crash when ...
I'm a bit lost here since when Jonathan asked for "a fixes tag" inclusion
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iio/22425), I supposed he
meant a tag such as one described in the Documentation/SubmittingPatches
file.
My initial attempt was sent with the subject:
"iio:pressure:ms5611: fix oops when probing regulator".

Would you please be kind enough to give me some sort of rules as to when
and how
to write subject lines related to fixes patch ?

I guess you can just put in a "Fixes:" line, along with your
"Signed-off-by:" lines.
Oh... <light bulb enlightenment/> ! I definitely need some decent manners lessons :)
Thanks.


Regards,
Grégor.


---
   drivers/iio/pressure/ms5611_core.c | 8 ++++++--
   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5611_core.c
b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5611_core.c
index 37dbc04..a2a871b 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5611_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5611_core.c
@@ -387,8 +387,8 @@ static const struct iio_info ms5611_info = {
   static int ms5611_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
   {
          int ret;
-       struct regulator *vdd =
devm_regulator_get(indio_dev->dev.parent,
-                                                  "vdd");
+       struct regulator *vdd =
+               devm_regulator_get_optional(indio_dev->dev.parent,
"vdd");

          /* Enable attached regulator if any. */
          if (!IS_ERR(vdd)) {
@@ -398,6 +398,10 @@ static int ms5611_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
                                  "failed to enable Vdd supply: %d\n",
ret);
                          return ret;
                  }
+       } else {
+               ret = PTR_ERR(vdd);
+               if (ret != -ENODEV)
+                       return ret;
          }

          ret = ms5611_reset(indio_dev);
--
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux