On 26/01/16 08:17, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 26.01.2016 um 01:15 schrieb Paul Bolle: >> On ma, 2016-01-25 at 23:24 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig >> >>> config INV_MPU6050_IIO >>> tristate "Invensense MPU6050 devices" >>> depends on I2C && SYSFS >>> + depends on I2C_MUX >> >> Nit: if I parsed the v4.5-rc1 tree correctly I2C_MUX depends I2C. So >> just >> depends on I2C_MUX && SYSFS >> >> should also do the trick. Is it clearer to mention both I2C and I2C_MUX >> explicitly? > > I don't have a strong opinion on that. In general I'm a fan of explicit > dependencies but in this case, you are right, also an implicit one should to it. > Let's see what maintainers think. :-) I find it hard to care ;) Anyhow, the version as stands applied to the rather odd fixes-post-4.5rc1 branch that I currently have in iio.git - will unwind that now we are post said version sometime in next few days (this on is only there because I needed to take patch 06 through that branch). Jonathan > > Thanks, > //richard > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
