Jonathan Cameron writes: > On 30/12/15 14:26, Harald Geyer wrote: > > The new algorithm uses a 'one size fits em all' threshold, which should > > be easier to understand and debug. I believe there are no regressions > > compared to the old adaptive threshold algorithm. I don't remember why > > I chose the old algorithm when I initially wrote the driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Harald Geyer <harald@xxxxxxxxx> > Hmm. Couple of trivial bits inline. > > I'd like some tested-by's on this one if possible... > > Such a 'fun' device ;) On the up-side its working on poor and long wiring almost as well as on good and short wiring ... ;) > > - timing[i] = t / timeres; > > + bits[i] = t > DHT11_THRESHOLD ? 1 : 0; > t > DHT11_THRESHOLD is already going to give 0 or 1... Thanks. I'll send a v2 after everybody has had enough time to test and comment on the whole series. Harald -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
