Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iio: chemical: vz89x: rework i2c transfer reading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just noticed... "  return (ret == VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE) ? 0 :
ret;"  which is wrong it should be the count of the messages
executed....

I need to see why this passed my testing :/

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26/11/15 17:11, Matt Ranostay wrote:
>> Add an optimized i2c transfer reading function, and fallback
>> to racey smbus transfers if client->adapter doesn't support this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@xxxxxxxxx>
> Few comments inline but nothing that stops me applying this.
>
> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out as testing.
> Note this branch will rebase soonish so don't base anything much on it!
>
> Jonathan
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
>> index 11e59a5..c3367aa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
>> @@ -34,8 +34,9 @@
>>  struct vz89x_data {
>>       struct i2c_client *client;
>>       struct mutex lock;
>> -     unsigned long last_update;
>> +     int (*xfer)(struct vz89x_data *data, u8 cmd);
>>
>> +     unsigned long last_update;
>>       u8 buffer[VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE];
>>  };
>>
>> @@ -100,27 +101,60 @@ static int vz89x_measurement_is_valid(struct vz89x_data *data)
>>       return !!(data->buffer[VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE - 1] > 0);
>>  }
>>
>> -static int vz89x_get_measurement(struct vz89x_data *data)
>> +static int vz89x_i2c_xfer(struct vz89x_data *data, u8 cmd)
>>  {
>> +     struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
>> +     struct i2c_msg msg[2];
>>       int ret;
>> -     int i;
>> +     u8 buf[3] = { cmd, 0, 0};
>>
>> -     /* sensor can only be polled once a second max per datasheet */
>> -     if (!time_after(jiffies, data->last_update + HZ))
>> -             return 0;
>> +     msg[0].addr = client->addr;
>> +     msg[0].flags = client->flags;
>> +     msg[0].len = 3;
>> +     msg[0].buf  = (char *) &buf;
>> +
>> +     msg[1].addr = client->addr;
>> +     msg[1].flags = client->flags | I2C_M_RD;
>> +     msg[1].len = VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE;
>> +     msg[1].buf = (char *) &data->buffer;
>> +
>> +     ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, 2);
>>
>> -     ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(data->client,
>> -                                     VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT, 0);
>> +     return (ret == VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE) ? 0 : ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vz89x_smbus_xfer(struct vz89x_data *data, u8 cmd)
>> +{
>> +     struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> I wouldn't have bothered with the local variable, but it's just
> a matter of personal taste so lets leave it be!
>
>> +     int ret;
>> +     int i;
>> +
>> +     ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(client, cmd, 0);
>>       if (ret < 0)
>>               return ret;
>>
>>       for (i = 0; i < VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE; i++) {
>> -             ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte(data->client);
>> +             ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte(client);
>>               if (ret < 0)
>>                       return ret;
>>               data->buffer[i] = ret;
>>       }
>>
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vz89x_get_measurement(struct vz89x_data *data)
>> +{
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +     /* sensor can only be polled once a second max per datasheet */
>> +     if (!time_after(jiffies, data->last_update + HZ))
>> +             return 0;
>> +
>> +     ret = data->xfer(data, VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT);
>> +     if (ret < 0)
>> +             return ret;
>> +
>>       ret = vz89x_measurement_is_valid(data);
>>       if (ret)
>>               return -EAGAIN;
>> @@ -204,15 +238,19 @@ static int vz89x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>       struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>>       struct vz89x_data *data;
>>
>> -     if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA |
>> -                                  I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE))
>> -             return -ENODEV;
>> -
>>       indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));
>>       if (!indio_dev)
>>               return -ENOMEM;
>> -
> THis is a random white space change that snuck in - hardly crucial but would
> have been cleaner if this hadn't been in the patch.
>>       data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> +
>> +     if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C))
>> +             data->xfer = vz89x_i2c_xfer;
>> +     else if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
>> +                             I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE))
>> +             data->xfer = vz89x_smbus_xfer;
>> +     else
>> +             return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +
>>       i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
>>       data->client = client;
>>       data->last_update = jiffies - HZ;
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux