On 08/11/15 14:10, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote: > >> On Nov 8, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Fell through the cracks I'm afraid. I think facility like this is still >>> needed as majority of the drivers do not care about short reads in the >>> slightest. >>> >> Would be great to pick it up again if you have the time! >> > > Certainly, the i2c chips handled by ad5446.c do no function at all with the > current state of the driver! > > I can resubmit a patch only for ad5446.c or wait for Dmitry's patch to be > applied, then make the proper change in ad5446.c. > > For now, our own tree contains my original patch, so we're good... thank you > open source! Where things are actually broken we'll want the fix in stable kernel trees so ideally we'll have the following: 1) Your current fix applied asap marked for stable. 2) Dmitry's patch resurfaces and allows us to follow up in a cycle or so with cleanups that move every case over to that, hopefully avoiding any further repeats of this problem! If you can role a response to the point Lars raised and send an updated series that would be great. Next set of fixes to head towards mainline will be next weekend at the earliest anyway so we have a bit of time to tidy up! Jonathan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html