On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:49:28AM +0200, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:40:56PM +0200, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > >> Starting with commit fd2bb310ca (Staging: iio: Move evgen interrupt > >> generation to irq_work) event processing is handled by calling > >> both the top half and the threaded part properly simulating real > >> hardware interrupts making use of threaded interrupts. > >> This way the processing is split in 2 parts: > >> > >> * the IRQ handler that runs in IRQ context and only saves the event > >> timestamp > >> * the threaded handler that runs in process context, reads the events > >> and pushes the in the userspace. > >> > >> If the IRQ handler returns IRQ_HANDLED the threaded handler is not > >> even being called since the interrupt is considered to be processed. > >> Because the iio dummy driver processes the events in the threaded > >> handler the IRQ handler must return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD so that the > >> threaded part would be awakened and called. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Fixes: fd2bb310ca ("Staging: iio: Move evgen interrupt generation to irq_work") > >> Acked-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> rebased on linux-iio tree > > > > Daniel, can you forward this to the iio developers, I can't take this as > > it doesn't apply to my tree :( > > > > I already sent it to the linux-iio list as Daniel suggested in a > previous message. > I hope it's ok. Fine with me, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html