Hi,
Sorry for my delayed response, answers inline.
Thank you,
Adriana
On 09.09.2015 04:05, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/07/2015 08:59 AM, Adriana Reus wrote:
Thanks for your feedback, some comments inline.
On 31.08.2015 18:38, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 20/08/15 11:12, Adriana Reus wrote:
Added entries in i2c/vendor-prefixes for the us5182d als and
proximity sensor.
Also added a documentation file for this sensor's properties.
Signed-off-by: Adriana Reus <adriana.reus@xxxxxxxxx>
This isn't that trivial so I'd like some device tree maintainer
input if possible.
It seems fairly reasonable to me. Would other ALS or proximity sensors
need similar properties?
The "glass-coef" is intended to compensate for the material (glass) that
may be covering the sensor if it's integrated in a phone, tablet etc. I
chose 1000 as resolution for this scaling factor (i'll add a more
detailed description). So possibly similar properties could be used for
other als sensors as well.
Seems like amstaos,cover-comp-gain would be doing the same thing. But it
is defined as an integer, so I'm not sure how that would work.
Indeed it seems similar. I had a quick look over it and from what I
understand it seems to act like a straightforward scaling factor, only
difference being that it's an int, I opted to float for a better tuning
and resolution.
The last 3 tuning parameters are specific to this particular sensor.
For now I've backed out the driver from my tree (given timing we have
loads of time to sort this out!)
Anyhow, anyone device tree related able to take a look at this.
Adriana, btw these should be cc'd to the device tree maintainers in
the first place (now added).
Jonathan
---
.../devicetree/bindings/iio/light/us5182d.txt | 23
++++++++++++++++++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/us5182d.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/us5182d.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/us5182d.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7785c56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/us5182d.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+* UPISEMI us5182d I2C ALS and Proximity sensor
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: must be "upisemi,usd5182"
+- reg: the I2C address of the device
+
+Optional properties:
Do you expect certain defaults if not present? Some description of how
all these values are determined would be useful.
Yes, if not present they will fall back to default values - the values
in the example.
- the glass-coef one is 1000 by default - so no glass compensation by
default (lux = lux * 1000/1000)
- the others were determined experimentally - by fine tuning starting
from the default values in those registers).
So the default if the properties are not present is a default register
value or a default in the driver?
A default in the driver.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
