Hi, I've been taking a look at the accelerometer drivers meaning to add some features for the chip BMA250. I've seen that this chip is supported by the bma180 driver [1], and that there's another driver for bmc150 [2] that supports BMA250E. Looking at the datasheets [3][4][5] I can't really understand why it is that way, as BMA250 and BMA250E register map looks exactly the same except for the FIFO memory, and BMA250 doesn't look similar to BMA180 to me. After some research on the internet and talking to Ben Dooks (who is guiding me through this) we couldn't arrive to a conclusion as to why this is this way. Could anyone clarify this a bit more? Could it make sense to move support of BMA250 to bmc180 driver? Thank you for your help [1] drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c [2] drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c [3] http://ae-bst.resource.bosch.com/media/products/dokumente/bma250/BST-BMA250-DS002-05.pdf [4] http://ae-bst.resource.bosch.com/media/products/dokumente/bma250e/BST-BMA250E-DS004-06.pdf [5] http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~tcs3/jumpman/jumppc/1107-BMA180/BMA180-DataSheet-v2.5.pdf -- Violeta Menéndez González http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Software Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
