On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila > <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila >> <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >>> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >>> change all driver's checks accordingly. >>> >>> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >>> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >>> above. >>> >>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that >> Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? > > Me or Torvalds? > > This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not > go through IIO. > Hi Linus, This patch fixes one issue introduced by "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have interrupt assigned" which I see it is merged in the GPIO for-next branch. That is why I thought you will pick it up, did I assume wrong? Thanks, Tavi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
