On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila > <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have >> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so >> change all driver's checks accordingly. >> >> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree >> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch >> above. >> >> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Jonathan, > > Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that > Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed? Me or Torvalds? This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not go through IIO. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
