On 16/06/15 11:33, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Apply the following coding style changes as indicated by checkpatch.pl in
>> strict mode:
>> - Please don't use multiple blank lines
>> - braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement (if/else)
>> - Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> - Please don't use multiple blank lines
>> - Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
>> - Missing a blank line after declarations
>> - No space is necessary after a cast
>>
>> Also wrap/consolidate error messages to fit 80 characters per line and
>> rework a comment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git, initially pushed out as testing for the
autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> index 36a9cd5..e84e2a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> @@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ static const struct {
>> {500000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_500_MS},
>> {1000000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_1_SEC} };
>>
>> -
>> static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
>> enum bmc150_power_modes mode,
>> int dur_us)
>> @@ -259,8 +258,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
>> dur_val =
>> bmc150_accel_sleep_value_table[i].reg_value;
>> }
>> - } else
>> + } else {
>> dur_val = 0;
>> + }
>>
>> if (dur_val < 0)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_bw(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table); ++i) {
>> if (bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val == val &&
>> - bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
>> + bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
>> ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(
>> data->client,
>> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_BW,
>> @@ -351,8 +351,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>>
>> ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, BMC150_ACCEL_REG_CHIP_ID);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> - "Error: Reading chip id\n");
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error: Reading chip id\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -376,8 +375,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_RANGE,
>> BMC150_ACCEL_DEF_RANGE_4G);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> - "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -437,12 +435,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_power_state(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, bool on)
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (on)
>> + if (on) {
>> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&data->client->dev);
>> - else {
>> + } else {
>> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&data->client->dev);
>> ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&data->client->dev);
>> }
>> +
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> "Failed: bmc150_accel_set_power_state for %d\n", on);
>> @@ -514,13 +513,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int i,
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
>> - * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
>> - * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
>> - * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
>> - * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of
>> - * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode
>> - * is always on so sequence doesn't matter
>> + * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in reverse
>> + * order. This will happen here anyway, as our resume operation uses
>> + * sync mode runtime pm calls. The suspend operation will be delayed
>> + * by autosuspend delay.
>> + * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse order of
>> + * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode is always on,
>> + * so sequence doesn't matter.
>> */
>> ret = bmc150_accel_set_power_state(data, state);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> @@ -574,7 +573,6 @@ out_fix_power_state:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -
>> static int bmc150_accel_set_scale(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val)
>> {
>> int ret, i;
>> @@ -674,8 +672,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP) {
>> *val = BMC150_ACCEL_TEMP_CENTER_VAL;
>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> - } else
>> + } else {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>> *val = 0;
>> switch (chan->type) {
>> @@ -793,7 +792,6 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> enum iio_event_type type,
>> enum iio_event_direction dir)
>> {
>> -
>> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>
>> return data->ev_enable_state;
>> @@ -827,7 +825,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> }
>>
>> static int bmc150_accel_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> - struct iio_trigger *trig)
>> + struct iio_trigger *trig)
>> {
>> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> int i;
>> @@ -963,6 +961,7 @@ static int __bmc150_accel_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> u16 buffer[BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH * 3];
>> int64_t tstamp;
>> uint64_t sample_period;
>> +
>> ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
>> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_FIFO_STATUS);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> @@ -1255,7 +1254,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_trig_try_reen(struct iio_trigger *trig)
>> }
>>
>> static int bmc150_accel_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
>> - bool state)
>> + bool state)
>> {
>> struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
>> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = t->data;
>> @@ -1314,26 +1313,32 @@ static int bmc150_accel_handle_roc_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING;
>>
>> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_X)
>> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> - 0,
>> - IIO_MOD_X,
>> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> - dir),
>> - data->timestamp);
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> + 0,
>> + IIO_MOD_X,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> + dir),
>> + data->timestamp);
>> +
>> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Y)
>> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> - 0,
>> - IIO_MOD_Y,
>> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> - dir),
>> - data->timestamp);
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> + 0,
>> + IIO_MOD_Y,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> + dir),
>> + data->timestamp);
>> +
>> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Z)
>> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> - 0,
>> - IIO_MOD_Z,
>> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> - dir),
>> - data->timestamp);
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> + 0,
>> + IIO_MOD_Z,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> + dir),
>> + data->timestamp);
>> +
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1365,7 +1370,9 @@ static irqreturn_t bmc150_accel_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *private)
>> BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_INT |
>> BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_RESET);
>> if (ret)
>> - dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> + "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
>> +
>> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> } else {
>> ret = IRQ_NONE;
>> @@ -1412,13 +1419,13 @@ static const char *bmc150_accel_match_acpi_device(struct device *dev, int *data)
>> if (!id)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - *data = (int) id->driver_data;
>> + *data = (int)id->driver_data;
>>
>> return dev_name(dev);
>> }
>>
>> static int bmc150_accel_gpio_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> - struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>> + struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>> {
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct gpio_desc *gpio;
>> --
>> 2.3.6
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
