Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add valid sample channel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/25/2014 07:27 PM, Octavian Purdila wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On November 25, 2014 5:00:11 PM GMT+00:00, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/25/2014 05:55 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 11/25/2014 01:48 PM, Vlad Dogaru wrote:

This is an attempt to address the problem of buffering in devices
which
have
different scan frequencies for different channels.


Will these frequencies still be related or completely arbitrary?

For Kionix KMX61 we have the same set of frequencies for
accelerometer and magnetometer (12.5, 25, 50, 100 Hz, etc)
but for example at some point accel can be configured with 100 Hz
and magnetometer with 12.5Hz.

Does this matter?

I'm wondering if it makes more sense to register multiple buffers or
devices
if the frequencies are completely unrelated. E.g. in the KMX61 case it
looks
as if its simply two logical devices in the same physical package.

- Lars
That is how we have handled this so far.
Sometimes we have separate iio_devices for
the logical functions e.g. hid-sensors and sometimes just multiple buffers.. I am
  struggling to find it now but one of the ADC drivers had a insanely complex nest
  sampling arrangement requiring 8 buffers. Final driver might have been simplified though...  We might still need a few tweaks
  for multiple buffers not to having naming clashes....  Moving house so only have phone to hand!


The main usage I see for a single device / buffer and multiple
channels is to reduce the user/kernel context switch overhead in a
sensor hub environment with lots of sensors (i.e. do a single read
instead of one for each sensor). The improvements are going to be even
bigger if the sensor hub supports a hardware buffer.

If those sensors run asynchronously to each other you'll end up with a lot of padding data which is quite likely going to negate any context switch overhead reduction.


Some people are quite vocal about that, although I didn't see data
that can be used to draw a relevant conclusion yet. Time to do some
experiments, I guess :)

Yes...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux