On 11/12/2014 07:35 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:11:52 AM Lee Jones wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Aaron Lu wrote: >> >>> On 10/31/2014 02:08 PM, Aaron Lu wrote: >>>> On Intel Baytrail-T and Baytrail-T-CR platforms, there are two customized >>>> ACPI operation regions defined for the Power Management Integrated Circuit >>>> device, one is for power resource handling and one is for thermal: sensor >>>> temperature reporting, trip point setting, etc. There are different PMIC >>>> chips used on those platforms and though each has the same two operation >>>> regions and functionality, their implementation is different so every PMIC >>>> will need a driver. But since their functionality is similar, some common >>>> code is abstracted into the intel_soc_pmic_opregion.c. >>>> >>>> The last version is posted here: >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/8/801 >>>> >>>> Changes since then: >>>> 1 Move to drivers/acpi as discussed on the above thread; >>>> 2 Added support for XPower AXP288 PMIC operation region support; >>>> 3 Since operation region handler can not be removed(at the moment at least), >>>> use bool for the two operation region driver configs instead of tristate; >>>> Another reason to do this is that, with Mika's MFD ACPI support patch, all >>>> those MFD cell devices created will have the same modalias as their parent's >>>> so it doesn't make much sense to compile these drivers into modules. >>>> >>>> Patch 1 applies on top of Rafael's pm-next branch, and then patch 2 and >>>> patch 3 needs merge of Lee's mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch where the PMIC >>>> driver XPower AXP288 and iio driver axp288_adc is located. >>> >>> Since patch 2-3 are based on top of the mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch, it >>> would be easy to go through the mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch. >>> >>> Rafael, >>> Can I get your ACK for the three patches? >>> >>> Lee, >>> Can you please take the series if Rafael gives it ack? >> >> Yes, no problem. > > Well, since the code is going to reside mostly in drivers/acpi, I think I should > be applying the patches and from your response it looks like you are fine with > them. Is that correct? Oh I thought you may not want to merge another branch into your next branch so I asked this question. If you can handle the whole thing in your tree, that's of course not a problem :-) Thanks, Aaron -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
