On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:41:59PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:46:38PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:38:33PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote: > > > > > > Alright, this is already ridiculous. Andrew, if I resend the patch can > > > > > > you apply it since maintainer has been ignoring this thread anyway ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you reall think this is the best way to approach this? > > > > > > > > when maintainer doesn't respond for weeks, yeah! Sure it is. > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it would be better to explain what each field of the > > > > > configuration register does and then we can move on. > > > > > > > > perhaps Jonathan could tell me exactly what he wants because I can't > > > > handle back-and-forth anymore. Specially when he complains about stuff > > > > he asked me to modify himself. > > > > > > > > > In particular the OPT3001_CONFIGURATION_L field needs to be explained > > > > > such that the ABI can be properly applied. > > > > > > > > > > Looking at the docs for the Windows demo program the field is associated > > > > > with a latch configuration. What does this bit field actually do? > > > > > > Still no technical information. Without all the facts how can you expect > > > him to tell you what he wants? > > > > yeah, because clearly he doesn't know himself, right ? > > Could you explain how it works to me then? checking how much of the docs I can expose now, gimme a couple days. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
