On 23/06/14 17:43, Denis Carikli wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:51 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
+static irqreturn_t mx25_gcq_irq(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct mx25_gcq_priv *priv = data;
+ u32 stats;
Not that much in here, but perhaps still makes sense for this to be a
threaded
irq?
What would be the advantage of converting it to be a threaded IRQ?
I guess that there will be no use of IRQF_SHARED and that only this driver will have to handle the GCQ IRQ in the future.
Fair enough. Was more of an idle thought that anything else!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
