Hi Chanwoo,
On 18.06.2014 04:21, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patchset fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC. Exynos3250 SoC
> need to control only special clock for ADC. Exynos SoC except for Exynos3250
> has not included special clock for ADC. The exynos ADC driver can control
> special clock if compatible string is 'exynos3250-adc-v2'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 6c1fb67..107dc44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -414,10 +414,10 @@
> };
>
> adc: adc@126C0000 {
> - compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3";
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc-v2";
> reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>;
> interrupts = <0 137 0>;
> - clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc";
> + clock-names = "adc", "sclk_adc";
So, is it "sclk_adc" or "sclk_tsadc"? The code uses the former, while
the documentation mentions the latter. Please fix this.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
