Dan Carpenter schrieb:
> My static checker is upset that we check IS_ERR(t->reg) when we know it
> is not an ERR_PTR(). The code is harmless but I have cleaned it up and
> removed the condition.
Good spot. But doesn't that also apply to the two checks in ad799x_remove()?
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
> index 16a8b14..5c95cd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
> @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int ad799x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev, NULL,
> &ad799x_trigger_handler, NULL);
> if (ret)
> - goto error_disable_reg;
> + goto error_disable_vref;
>
> if (client->irq > 0) {
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev,
> @@ -739,11 +739,10 @@ static int ad799x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> error_cleanup_ring:
> iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
> +error_disable_vref:
> + regulator_disable(st->vref);
> error_disable_reg:
> - if (!IS_ERR(st->vref))
> - regulator_disable(st->vref);
> - if (!IS_ERR(st->reg))
> - regulator_disable(st->reg);
> + regulator_disable(st->reg);
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
