Hi Dan, On Monday 24 February 2014 14:33:16 Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 02:16:24PM +0100, Juergen Beisert wrote: > > > While I don't have much experience with the TS part of the code but I > > > can investigate if you don't have any idea. > > > > can you please test the following patch? > > After releasing the touchscreen the internal state machine was left in a > > wrong state. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c > > index e2dd783..558a76c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c > > @@ -698,6 +698,7 @@ static void mxs_lradc_finish_touch_event(struct > > mxs_lradc *lradc, bool valid) } > > > > /* if it is released, wait for the next touch via IRQ */ > > + lradc->cur_plate = LRADC_TOUCH; > > mxs_lradc_reg_clear(lradc, LRADC_CTRL1_TOUCH_DETECT_IRQ, LRADC_CTRL1); > > mxs_lradc_reg_set(lradc, LRADC_CTRL1_TOUCH_DETECT_IRQ_EN, LRADC_CTRL1); > > } > > I am confused. Why don't you send this like a normal patch? For testing fist. But you are right, patch will follow. Regards, Juergen -- Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert | Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
