Hi Dan,
On Wednesday 04 September 2013 16:27:39 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> [...]
> ACTUALLY! When I look at it now the third argument is almost always
> "set", "clear" or "toggle".
>
> So we could do:
>
> static inline void lradc_reg_set(struct mxs_lradc *lradc, u32 val,
> size_t chan)
> {
> writel(val, lradc->base + chan + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> }
>
> So then it would be:
>
> lradc_reg_clear(lradc_plate_mask(lradc), LRADC_CTRL0);
> lradc_reg_set(lradc_enable_touch(lradc), LRADC_CTRL0);
>
> I've just changed 11 lines of code down to 2 lines of code by hiding the
> if statement in the header file.
>
> Please redo this patch along those lines.
I like this simplification, but all the other drivers for the MXS series of
SoCs don't use such a method. Do you think this "new style" will be accepted?
Regards,
Juergen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
