I'm also wondering if adi,sync-in-gpios should be instead represented in trigger-sources. This would mean we need a 'gpio-trigger' binding. That would make the handling of trigger sources more uniform. But maybe not worth the complexity. Rob
I'm also wondering if adi,sync-in-gpios should be instead represented in trigger-sources. This would mean we need a 'gpio-trigger' binding. That would make the handling of trigger sources more uniform. But maybe not worth the complexity. Rob
![]() |