Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: ti_tsc: Enable shared IRQ for TSC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 12:08:11PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 07/27/13 00:51, Zubair Lutfullah wrote:
> > From: "Patil, Rachna" <rachna@xxxxxx>
> > 
> > Touchscreen and ADC share the same IRQ line from parent MFD core.
> > Previously only Touchscreen was interrupt based.
> > With continuous mode support added in ADC driver, driver requires
> > interrupt to process the ADC samples, so enable shared IRQ flag bit for
> > touchscreen.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Patil, Rachna <rachna@xxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah <zubair.lutfullah@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> I'd rather this went via input independent of the other patch
> (if not there all that will happen is one or other driver will
> fail to probe if both are attempted?)
> 
> Can take it through IIO but only with a Dmitry Ack.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c |   18 ++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
> > index e1c5300..68d1250 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
> > @@ -260,8 +260,18 @@ static irqreturn_t titsc_irq(int irq, void *dev)
> >  	unsigned int fsm;
> >  
> >  	status = titsc_readl(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS);
> > -	if (status & IRQENB_FIFO0THRES) {
> > -
> > +	/*
> > +	 * ADC and touchscreen share the IRQ line.
> > +	 * FIFO1 threshold, FIFO1 Overrun and FIFO1 underflow
> > +	 * interrupts are used by ADC,
> > +	 * hence return from touchscreen IRQ handler if FIFO1
> > +	 * related interrupts occurred.
> > +	 */
> > +	if ((status & IRQENB_FIFO1THRES) ||
> > +			(status & IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN) ||
> > +			(status & IRQENB_FIFO1UNDRFLW))
> > +		return IRQ_NONE;
> > +	else if (status & IRQENB_FIFO0THRES) {

What happens if both parts have data at the same time? Can both
IRQENB_FIFO1THRES and IRQENB_FIFO0THRES be signalled? What will happen
in this case?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux