Hi, On 02/07/2013 18:13, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Alexandre Belloni, > >> On 02/07/2013 14:03, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> Dear Alexandre Belloni, >>> >>>> Dear Marek, >>>> >>>> I don't seem to be hitting that issue. I'm using 3.10rc7. Do you know >>>> how to reproduce it ? >>> >>> The check is just redundant, it's not a bug. >> >> Ok, that's what I understood first but then got confused by reports of >> it solving a bug. > > It cannot solve a thing. If it does, then we have a problem. > > What kind of bug do you see ? How can I replicate it ? Can you send me a > testcase? > It doesn't solve anything on my side, I never saw any issue with that code. I was surprised by those reports though: http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=137275710622191&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=137273629716559&w=2 Hector and Otavio seem to be the ones with an issue ;) -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
