On 03/04/2013 09:15 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 04/03/13 09:09, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> On 03/02/2013 05:16 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> As Lars-Peter noticed, I was being an idiot and the original set would >>> never have worked. Actually it turned out that they would have also >>> gotten the handling of shared and separate the wrong way around and there >>> were a few other minor issues elsewhere. >>> >>> Now a lot of people were kind enough to take a look at the original patches >>> and provide Acks on the mistaken assumption that the basic principle worked. >>> (given the cc list would have been huge many people probably never saw >>> anything other than the individual driver patches which in of themselves >>> appeared sane). >>> If people do not reply this time around I'll assume their acks are good >>> for this set and apply them. (Of course if anyone want so re ack the >>> corrected patches that is great as well!). Any tested-by's would also >>> be great as right now I've only actually tested with one driver. >>> >>> Well that was an 'interesting' way to start off this cycle :( >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Looks good on a first glimpse. Can you push this to a branch on your repo? >> Makes testing things easier. > Away from my dev machine until this evening. Will do so then. When it gets through from the backend these (and the extra couple in the other series) will be available in a branch of iio.git called info_mask_split Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
