> +@r1@ > +identifier fn; > +identifier xfers; > +@@ > +fn(...) > +{ > + ... > +( > + struct spi_transfer xfers[...]; > +| > + struct spi_transfer xfers[]; > +) > + ... > +} Can it happen that there would be more than one spi_transfer or spi_message variable per function? This semantic patch will only treat the case where there is only one, because the ... before an after the variable declaration won't match another declaration of the same form. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html