Le 22/12/2012 18:21, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > On 10:07 Fri 21 Dec , Maxime Ripard wrote: >> Le 20/12/2012 17:13, ludovic.desroches a écrit : >>> I have not found other ways to deal with it properly. I would like to >>> have them hidden into the driver (depending on the compatible string) >>> but it will be a mess if we split parameters into dt and driver. >> >> I'm glad we feel the same way :) > I'm not I fee; exactly this opposte way > > I do want to toucht the kernel code to add new soc This is an argument we already had, and yes, I still don't like these bindings. And both this patchset and what Ludovic and you said in this thread have proven that this is something that can't be achieved, you'll always have to modify the driver anyway. -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
