Am 10.12.2012 21:22, schrieb Lars-Peter Clausen:
> On 12/10/2012 08:45 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> Am 10.12.2012 18:05, schrieb Lars-Peter Clausen:
>>
>>> Looks pretty good now. But there are still some IIO remnants which should be
>>> removed as well. Also the driver should move to drivers/rtc/ since, well,
>>> it's a rtc driver not a IIO driver.
>>
>> I think it still should be stick to iio, because that is where all HID
>> sensors currently are found and where the user would expect to find such
>> a driver.
>
> That's because all the current IIO sensor drivers fall in the IIO domain. This
> one clearly is a RTC driver, so it belongs in drivers/rtc/
Where nobody will find it if he searches for drivers for his HID sensor.
I still see it as HID sensor driver and not a rtc-driver.
But ...
>
>>
>>>> +/* Channel definitions */
>>>> +static const struct iio_chan_spec hid_time_channels[TIME_RTC_CHANNEL_MAX] = {
>>
>> And that is imho the last remaining iio-stuff. If necessary I can remove
>> it too.
>
> That and the remaining bits of the read_raw callback.
Ok. I will make a v3.
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
