Re: i.MX28 die temperature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/27/2012 1:00 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Jonathan Cameron,

On 6/26/2012 8:02 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Juergen Beisert,

Hi Marek,

Marek Vasut wrote:
[...]

Take a look at: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-iio/msg04345.html

Any progress here with inclusion in some git tree?

Well ... I recently raised from the dead. It's on the schedule,
obviously help is welcome.

I tried a little bit with your driver. The disadvantage I see is, its
claims all the free AD channels. But a few of them can also act as a
touchscreen controller. Shouldn't be the driver handle the channel usage
dynamically?

I wonder, I'd rather see this driver behave as a composite driver, what
do you think?

Alternative (though it's still in development) would be to use IIO
as the ADC layer and sit the other parts on top.

I think you need to adjust a few bits there and there in the hardware to behave
as a touchscreen. Will IIO be able to handle that somehow ?
No means of doing it yet. I'm not entirely sure this can be done generically. I'm not really familiar enough with touchscreen adcs as none of my boards have one. At worst I'm sure we can put some
hooks in to get hold of the underlying device if necessary.


die temp and basic
adc are fine but no one has taken on a touchscreen controller via that
approach yet.

Is there any example of these basic things already?
Saddly only patches posted on the list for the interrupt driven side of things. I have an updated version (that acutally works reasonably well) but haven't posted as yet as want to take another look at some of the
error cases when switching buffers in and out (all about rolling back
sucessfully to a valid configuration when an invalid one has failed).

The hwmon stuff is in tree though as drivers/staging/iio/iio_hwmon.c I really ought to get round to posting that one for inclusion under drivers/hmwon. Guenter was reasonably happy with the version that is
there so shouldn't be too much trouble.


They tend to have a nasty large number of extremely
special purpose bits.  I've certainly not thought through how to handle
those yet.

Also this AD module on the SoC can measure the die
temperature, battery voltage and some other power supplies.
I see more than one framework this driver should connect to: simple ADC
(IIO), touchscreen controller (INPUT), die temp (POWER?), various
voltages (POWER? REGULATOR?). Should it be a multi function device?

Correct, making it a MFD device with common channel-management logic is
the way to go. And it's gonna be a few resends of this driver, that's
for certain. I'm not confident I'll be able to make it right at the
first try ;-)

INPUT -- touchscreen
IIO -- die temp and LRADC (maybe random voltages?)

Mapping the die temp onto hwmon as obviously thats where it ultimately
should appear.

Ah correct.

POWER -- battery

But all this MFD goo is quite simple, the hard part is the channel
management logic. From the top of my head, there're 16 channels, 8 can
be sampled at the same time and there are 4 configuration triggers.
Making it one hell of a complex hardware.

It is indeed a nasty beast. Good luck ;)

Mmm ... sounds more like "condolences" :-D
:)

I'll fix the remnants of SPI and start on this beast tonight or tomorrow.
Since there was some progress in the IIO, I believe I'll have to rework
it a bit.

Juergen

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Best regards,
Marek Vasut



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux