Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:30:47PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> >Anyway, all I care about to get this code out of staging is that you >> >feel your userspace api is "sane" and not going to change. Your >> >in-kernel stuff can radically change every kernel release with no >> >objection from me at all. >> > >> >And from what I can tell, your userspace stuff looks pretty stable >now, >> >right? So, I don't mind moving this all out of staging for 3.5 >as-is. >> >> There are corners of the userspace abi that aren't but they aren't >> related to the core so we can break the abi docs in two and just move >> the good stuff... > >Ok, that sounds like a good first step. > >> >If so, I'll be glad to make the change to my repo so it starts to >show >> >up in linux-next in the "correct" place whenever you want me to. >> >> Will clear current queue under review then that would be great. >> >> Note we will need to leave a lot of drivers in staging for now so >move >> may require a few sed scripts to link up headers etc... quite a lot >> of drivers are way off. > >Why would some drivers stay? It should only be because of the >userspace >api, not because they don't work properly, that's never stopped drivers >from entering the main part of the kernel before :) > You got it in one. They have userspace interfaces that are miles from where they should be... >> Lets start a fresh thread on the move to make sure everyone agrees on >> what is ready! > >Sounds good. > >greg k-h -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
